<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox popup blocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inodes.org/blog/2008/06/20/firefox-popup-blocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inodes.org/blog/2008/06/20/firefox-popup-blocking/</link>
	<description>Moo - Development, Trouble-shooting and Random thoughts...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hardy.dropblog - Why destination-based popup blocking fails</title>
		<link>http://inodes.org/blog/2008/06/20/firefox-popup-blocking/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>hardy.dropblog - Why destination-based popup blocking fails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inodes.org/blog/?p=75#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>[...] mused about having firefox allow popups based on destination, rather than source. Here&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mused about having firefox allow popups based on destination, rather than source. Here&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://inodes.org/blog/2008/06/20/firefox-popup-blocking/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inodes.org/blog/?p=75#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>You'd want to have it both ways I think. You'd still want to allow sites you trust to have their way with your browser.

Another example for "destination allowing" is the webmail provided by GMX.de. You have to allow popups in order to see attachments but that means you've opened yourself up to their ads as well (triggered by unrelated "on-click" events. argh!). Making that work would require full path matching though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d want to have it both ways I think. You&#8217;d still want to allow sites you trust to have their way with your browser.</p>
<p>Another example for &#8220;destination allowing&#8221; is the webmail provided by GMX.de. You have to allow popups in order to see attachments but that means you&#8217;ve opened yourself up to their ads as well (triggered by unrelated &#8220;on-click&#8221; events. argh!). Making that work would require full path matching though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
